
Pull the most recent Gartner CMO Spend Survey and the picture is clear. Paid media is 30.6% of the average marketing budget, the single largest line item. It is also the only category that has grown its share of marketing spend over the past five years, according to Gartner's 2025 survey of 402 marketing leaders across North America, the UK, and Europe. Every other line has lost ground. Martech sits at 22.4%, labor at 21.9%, agencies at 20.7%, and all three have eroded. The question every CMO...
Pull the most recent Gartner CMO Spend Survey and the picture is clear. Paid media is 30.6% of the average marketing budget, the single largest line item. It is also the only category that has grown its share of marketing spend over the past five years, according to Gartner's 2025 survey of 402 marketing leaders across North America, the UK, and Europe.
Every other line has lost ground. Martech sits at 22.4%, labor at 21.9%, agencies at 20.7%, and all three have eroded.
The question every CMO is going to be asked over the next four quarters is whether paid media is absorbing the budget because it works the hardest, or because the budgeting muscle memory has not caught up to where attention actually lives in 2026.
This post walks through what the real numbers say, what they do not say, and where the smart money is already moving.
According to Gartner's 2025 CMO Spend Survey, here is what the average marketing budget looks like right now:
Marketing budgets are flat at 7.7% of overall company revenue, unchanged from 2024. 59% of CMOs report insufficient budget to execute their strategy this year.
The story inside those numbers is what matters. Gartner reports that paid media has grown its share by 11% year over year, while every other category has shed ground. Paid is the only line that has expanded its slice of the pie over the past five years.
Digital channels now account for 61.1% of total marketing spend, with 69% of all digital spend going to paid channels. Paid search alone takes 13.9% of total digital spend.
That is the macro picture. The question is whether the curve keeps bending toward more of the same or something different.
The answer to "how much should we spend on experiential" depends heavily on industry.
Across all marketers, event marketing accounts for an average of 14% of total marketing budgets, according to industry reports aggregated by G2 and others.
The average masks significant variation:
So the "experiential vs. paid media" conversation is not a single ratio. For a B2C beauty brand, experiential may already run larger than paid. For a B2B software company, paid still dwarfs experiential by a wide margin. For the average marketer, paid is roughly 2x experiential.
What is consistent across sectors is the direction of travel.
Gartner reports paid media as the only segment that has grown share over five years. That gets the press cycle.
The signal that does not get the same attention comes from a different set of data points:
In beauty and skincare specifically, 84% of companies have increased experiential budgets over the last three years according to Gradient. Per-campaign experiential budget has grown roughly 15% year over year on average.
Read those numbers together. Paid media is winning the share of budget battle right now. Experiential is winning the rate of change battle. The first is a snapshot. The second is a vector.
If your 2026 budget still has experiential at 5% to 10% of total spend, you are not just behind the curve. You are tracking against competitors whose category is shifting around them.
Paid media is not getting worse uniformly. It is getting more expensive on most platforms with selective exceptions.
According to recent CPM tracking:
Not every platform is moving up at the same pace. Social media CPMs actually dipped 4.4% in Q4 2024 versus Q4 2023, settling around $5.69 per 1,000 impressions according to industry tracking.
The question is not "is paid media getting worse." The question is whether paid media is compounding at the same rate it absorbs budget. For most categories, the answer is no. CPMs rise faster than they fall, organic reach continues to compress, and the relationship between an impression and a measurable business outcome has not improved.
That is the case to make internally for reallocating share, and it is a case you can make with sourced data.
This section is opinion grounded in the work we run at National Experiential, not third party research.
We use a framework called Spectacle Math. A well-designed brand activation produces value across four stages:
Most brands budget for stage one. The dollars stop the night the activation ends. The cameras pack up. The measurement stops.
The brands producing the most leverage from experiential are budgeting for all four stages from day one. Production teams, content capture, distribution planning, and asset library work are part of the brief, not afterthoughts.
This is the part of the math that rarely shows up as a separate line item. It is also the part that determines whether the activation produced 10% or 100% of its possible value. Paid media produces an impression and then the budget ends. Experiential produces an asset that keeps working for the next 12 to 24 months.
The most common pushback on increasing experiential marketing investment is "we cannot measure it the way we measure paid media."
That is a tooling problem, not a budget problem.
Experiential marketing ROI measurement in 2026 looks like this:
Any brand running this stack can measure brand activation budget performance with the same precision as paid media. Most brands are not running this stack because they have not invested in building it, not because the measurement is impossible.
Under Instrumented channels lose budget fights every time. The fix is to build the measurement stack before you make the case for the reallocation.
The honest version of this conversation is not "paid media is broken, shift everything to experiential."
The honest version is two questions every CMO should be answering for 2026.
First, is paid media in your category still compounding at the rate it absorbs budget? Look at your CPM trend, your branded search lift per dollar, and your funnel attribution. If paid is rising in cost faster than it produces incremental return, the share you have allocated to it is wrong.
Second, are you measuring experiential the way you measure paid? If not, your dashboard is making experiential look soft when the issue is instrumentation, not impact.
If both answers point the same direction, the budget should follow.
If you are a CMO planning 2026 allocation right now:
The data shows the smart money is already moving. 80% of companies have increased experiential marketing spend. 74% of Fortune 1000 marketers plan to increase it further in 2025. The question is whether your 2026 marketing budget reflects where the field is going or where it has been.
Ready to rethink your 2026 marketing budget?
We work with brands reallocating toward experiential marketing right now. If you are a CMO or marketing lead building the internal case, we have the case studies, the measurement frameworks, and the activation roadmaps to back you up.
If what you just read maps to something you're planning, tell us about it and we'll come back within 24 hours.
Start a project with NE →